Mass. high court says $70,000 engagement ring must be returned to giver if wedding called off
In a unanimous decision on Friday, the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court held that an engagement ring must be returned to the giver if the marriage never takes place, overturning the state’s long-held rule that the ring should go to whomever is not “at fault” for the breakup.
The Associated Press on MSN20h
Revising the rules of engagement, court says jilted bride must give back $70,000 ringWho gets to keep an engagement ring if a wedding is called off? That’s what the highest court in Massachusetts was asked to ...
1don MSN
Massachusetts has overruled a six-decade ruling that engagement rings are returned to the offended party in a former coupling ...
Jilted brides should return engagement rings to their exes even though it was not them who called off the wedding, a judge ...
One of the most important do's of engagement ring shopping is to give yourself ample time to explore your options. Rushing ...
A groom-to-be claimed in a complaint that a Tennessee jeweler did not insure a ring they were having serviced with the ...
Kyle Richards' daughter Alexia Umansky posed wearing a large diamond ring in a video with longtime love Jake Zingerman.
US Weekly on MSN17h
Zoe Kravitz Ditches Engagement Ring at Dinner With Taylor Swift After Channing Tatum SplitZoe Kravitz joined her longtime friend Taylor Swift for dinner in New York City on Friday, November 8, after ending her ...
her ring finger on her left hand was noticeably bare. Getty Missing from Kravitz's jewelry collection was her whopper of an ...
Which party is at fault for a broken engagement should no longer govern how Massachusetts courts handle disputes over who ...
BOSTON - When a couple breaks off an engagement, who should keep the ring? That’s the question the Massachusetts Supreme ...
Results that may be inaccessible to you are currently showing.
Hide inaccessible results
Feedback