The fight over AI summaries is part of a larger struggle playing out in newsrooms figuring out where human editors still fit ...

More websites, including Wikipedia and academic archives, are grousing about AI freeloaders that siphon their information.

Newspapers have offered puzzles in some capacity for as long as anyone can remember, with crosswords being the most renowned. But when TheNew York Times bought Wordle at the start of 2022, things ...

An analysis found that about 40% of over 1,000 randomly selected Wikipedia articles contain outdated or incorrect information ...

Wikipedia halts its AI summary rollout after human editors raise concerns about credibility. Wikipedia has long allowed its (human) users to add and edit entries. Recently, it rolled out AI summaries ...

Andrew Huberman, a respected neuroscientist and popular science communicator, has found himself at the center of a digital storm. Once celebrated for bringing science into the mainstream, he’s now the ...

Wikipedia co-founder Larry Sanger has warned that the website can no longer be trusted — insisting it is now just “propaganda” for the left-leaning “establishment.” Sanger told UnHerd ...

Editors almost immediately criticized the pilot, raising concerns that it could damage Wikipedia's credibility.

According to 404 Media, Wikipedia announced the opt-in AI pilot on June 2, which was set to run for two weeks on the mobile version of the site. The summaries appeared at the top of select articles in ...

Jewish groups harshly criticized Wikipedia after its volunteer editors said the ADL “has repeatedly published false and misleading statements” about the Israel-Gaza war.